SPRINGS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., 15-2684. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150921c69
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of September, upon consideration of defendant Prime Care Medical, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) and plaintiff Cody Springs's response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in our Memorandum issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Prime Care's motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) is GRANTED; 2. Count I of the amended complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to defendant Prime Care Medical
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of September, upon consideration of defendant Prime Care Medical, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) and plaintiff Cody Springs's response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in our Memorandum issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Prime Care's motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) is GRANTED; 2. Count I of the amended complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to defendant Prime Care Medical,..
More
ORDER
STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 17th day of September, upon consideration of defendant Prime Care Medical, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) and plaintiff Cody Springs's response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in our Memorandum issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Prime Care's motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) is GRANTED;
2. Count I of the amended complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to defendant Prime Care Medical, Inc. only; and
3. Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to FILE a second amended complaint if he can do so conformably with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and does so by noon on October 3, 2015.
Source: Leagle
