DONEGAN v. LIVINGSTON, 3:11-cv-812. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120711c21
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 3 rd day of July, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claim for unlawful arrest (Count I) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiff's claim for violation of freedom of association (Count II) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and they are DISMISSED WITHO
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 3 rd day of July, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claim for unlawful arrest (Count I) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiff's claim for violation of freedom of association (Count II) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and they are DISMISSED WITHOU..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's claim for unlawful arrest (Count I) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
2. Plaintiff's claim for violation of freedom of association (Count II) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and they are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-file in state court; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
