USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, 1:12-CV-1178. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140813d33
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge. AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of the motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Robert A. Simpson (Doc. 77) and the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61), filed by third-party defendant Schneider Electric USA, Inc. ("Schneider"), formerly known as Square D Company ("Square D"), against third-party plaintiff Metropolitan Edison Company ("Met-Ed"), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying memoran
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge. AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of the motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Robert A. Simpson (Doc. 77) and the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61), filed by third-party defendant Schneider Electric USA, Inc. ("Schneider"), formerly known as Square D Company ("Square D"), against third-party plaintiff Metropolitan Edison Company ("Met-Ed"), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying memorand..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of the motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Robert A. Simpson (Doc. 77) and the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61), filed by third-party defendant Schneider Electric USA, Inc. ("Schneider"), formerly known as Square D Company ("Square D"), against third-party plaintiff Metropolitan Edison Company ("Met-Ed"), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Schneider's motion in limine (Doc. 77) is DENIED.
2. Schneider's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
a. The motion (Doc. 61) is GRANTED with respect to Met-Ed's negligence claim; and
b. The motion (Doc. 61) is DENIED with respect to Met-Ed's strict liability claim.
3. A revised scheduling order setting this matter for trial shall issue by future order of the court.
Source: Leagle
