Everett v. Superintendent, Sci Fayette, 15-1639. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181214f32
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON , District Judge . This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On December 3, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 19) recommending that Jevon A. Everett's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. 1) be dismissed, and that a certificate of appealabili
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON , District Judge . This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On December 3, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 19) recommending that Jevon A. Everett's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. 1) be dismissed, and that a certificate of appealabilit..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.
This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
On December 3, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 19) recommending that Jevon A. Everett's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) be dismissed, and that a certificate of appealability be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Petitioner filed Objections on December 7, 2018. See Doc. 20.
After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, it hereby is ORDERED that Jevon A. Everett's habeas petition is DISMISSED; a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
