Granados v. Warden, Southeast Correctional Institution, 2:16-cv-879. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190624c04
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . On May 7, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. (ECF No. 18.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. Therefore, the R&R (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . On May 7, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. (ECF No. 18.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. Therefore, the R&R (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)..
More
ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
On May 7, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. (ECF No. 18.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. Therefore, the R&R (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability. Because Petitioner has waived the right to file an appeal by failing to file objections to the R&R, see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 950 (6th Cir. 1981), the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
