DRAYTON v. COHEN, 12-6463. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120806062
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Selest Drayton appeals the district court's order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Drayton's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and deny Drayton's motion to appoint appellate counsel. Drayton v. Cohen, No. 2:10-cv-
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Selest Drayton appeals the district court's order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Drayton's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and deny Drayton's motion to appoint appellate counsel. Drayton v. Cohen, No. 2:10-cv-0..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Selest Drayton appeals the district court's order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Drayton's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and deny Drayton's motion to appoint appellate counsel. Drayton v. Cohen, No. 2:10-cv-03171-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
