TENISON v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CIV-13-110-C. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20140925e45
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on August 18, 2014. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and the
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on August 18, 2014. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and the M..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on August 18, 2014. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 24), filed by Defendants Morton, Knutson, and McCoy is granted; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27), filed by Defendants Miller, Jones, and Roof is granted; Plaintiff's claims against the Oklahoma Department of Corrections are dismissed with prejudice under the Eleventh Amendment, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and Cimarron Correctional Facility are dismissed. Plaintiff's "Motion to Rebuttal Defendant's Motion" (Dkt. No. 32), and his "Motion to Settlement" (Dkt. No. 33) are denied as moot. A judgment shall enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
