Blount v. Jefferson County Adult Probation, 1:16cv114. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180227d37
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RON CLARK , District Judge . Plaintiffs Eric A. Blount and Shronda Renee Blount, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends the plaintiffs' motion for default jud
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RON CLARK , District Judge . Plaintiffs Eric A. Blount and Shronda Renee Blount, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends the plaintiffs' motion for default judg..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RON CLARK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Eric A. Blount and Shronda Renee Blount, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (docket entry no. 9) be denied.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore
ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (docket entry no. 9) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
