Johnson v. Parker, 1:18-0032. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20190620d77
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JEFFERY S. FRENSLEY , Magistrate Judge . The undersigned previously entered an Order on May 29, 2018 (Docket No. 29), requiring Plaintiff to file with the Court a written explanation showing cause for his failure to Keep the Clerk's Office informed of his current address, and it also stated "If Plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice." As of the date of the filing
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JEFFERY S. FRENSLEY , Magistrate Judge . The undersigned previously entered an Order on May 29, 2018 (Docket No. 29), requiring Plaintiff to file with the Court a written explanation showing cause for his failure to Keep the Clerk's Office informed of his current address, and it also stated "If Plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice." As of the date of the filing o..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JEFFERY S. FRENSLEY, Magistrate Judge.
The undersigned previously entered an Order on May 29, 2018 (Docket No. 29), requiring Plaintiff to file with the Court a written explanation showing cause for his failure to Keep the Clerk's Office informed of his current address, and it also stated "If Plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice."
As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice.
Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14) days after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to the Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have fourteen (14) days after service of any objections filed to this Report in which to file any response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 111 (1986); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
Source: Leagle
