Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Williams, 7:02-CR-149-BR-1. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190129a93
Filed: Jan. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON PROBABLE CAUSE AND DETENTION ROBERT B. JONES, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter came before the court today for a preliminary examination on the government's motion for revocation of Defendant's supervised release and for a hearing on the government's motion to detain Defendant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3141 et seq. At the commencement of the consolidated hearings, Defendant indicated through counsel his intention to waive the preliminary examination and detention hearing in t
More

ORDER ON PROBABLE CAUSE AND DETENTION

This matter came before the court today for a preliminary examination on the government's motion for revocation of Defendant's supervised release and for a hearing on the government's motion to detain Defendant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq.

At the commencement of the consolidated hearings, Defendant indicated through counsel his intention to waive the preliminary examination and detention hearing in this matter. Defendant and his counsel executed the requisite paperwork memorializing Defendant's desire to waive the preliminary examination and detention hearing in this case. After conducting an inquiry of Defendant and his counsel in open court, this court finds that Defendant has waived his right to a preliminary examination and detention hearing knowingly and voluntarily and the court accepts Defendant's waiver of his right to a preliminary examination and detention hearing.

Based on Defendant's knowing and voluntary waiver, this court finds probable cause exists to hold Defendant over for a hearing on the government's motion to revoke probation. Based on Defendant's waiver of his right to a detention hearing, there is no condition, or combination of conditions, that can be imposed which would reasonably assure Defendant's appearance and/or the safety of another person or the community.

Defendant is therefore committed to the custody of the Attorney General or a designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or held in custody pending appeal. Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with defense counsel. On order of United States Court or on request of an attorney for the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver Defendant to the United States Marshals for a court appearance.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer