Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnsen v. Tambe, 19-141-TSZ. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20191029n61 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHELLE L. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . This is a 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner civil rights action. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's response to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly's Minute Order dated October 16, 2019. (Dkt. # 43 (Jonathan Ballard Declaration ("Ballard Decl.")).) Judge Zilly vacated the pending Report and Recommendation in this matter due solely to concerns that Plaintiff had not been properly served with actual notice of Defendant's pending motion for su
More

ORDER

This is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil rights action. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's response to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly's Minute Order dated October 16, 2019. (Dkt. # 43 (Jonathan Ballard Declaration ("Ballard Decl.")).) Judge Zilly vacated the pending Report and Recommendation in this matter due solely to concerns that Plaintiff had not been properly served with actual notice of Defendant's pending motion for summary judgment given his release date from the Skagit County Jail. (Dkt. # 42 (Judge Zilly's 10/16/19 Minute Order).) Judge Zilly gave Defendant an opportunity to assure the Court that Plaintiff actually received such notice, and ordered that "[i]f defendant can verify that plaintiff was actually served with the Rand notice and the pending motion for summary judgment, he shall file a declaration within seven (7) days of this Minute Order." (Id. at 1-2.) Judge Zilly directed that "[i]f not, defendant shall take steps to locate plaintiff and arrange for service of the Rand notice, as well as his motion, file a revised declaration of service, and renote his motion for an appropriate date." (Id. at 2)

Defendant responded to Judge Zilly's Minute Order by filing a declaration from defense counsel that does not comply with Judge Zilly's directives. (Ballard Decl.) Defense counsel confirmed that he attempted to serve Defendant's motion for summary judgment and the Rand notice on Plaintiff at the Skagit County Jail, but those documents were returned to him by the U.S. Postal Service marked "Return to Sender" because Plaintiff was no longer in custody. (Id. at ¶¶ 2-5.) Thus, although Defendant filed a declaration in response to Judge Zilly's Minute Order, he provided evidence confirming Judge Zilly's suspicions that Plaintiff was not actually served with those documents and failed to acknowledge the second directive in Judge Zilly's Minute Order at all. Rather, defense counsel simply asserts that he had already "appropriately served [Plaintiff] at his address of record on file with the Court." (Id. at ¶ 7.) Defense counsel also pointed out that Plaintiff had failed to notify him, or the Court, of his change of address, which suggests that defense counsel is not taking any steps to locate the Plaintiff. (Id. at ¶¶ 8-9.)

Defendant is directed to comply with Judge Zilly's Minute Order by no later than Wednesday, November 6, 2019. Specifically, Defendant shall "take steps to locate plaintiff and arrange for service of the Rand notice, as well as his motion, file a revised declaration of service, and renote his motion for an appropriate date." (Judge Zilly's 10/16/19 Minute Order.) Counsel is advised that as a general matter, the Court expects counsel to disclose the fact that attempts to serve documents, and particularly dispositive motions, were unsuccessful.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer