Del Mazo v. Mount Juliet Police Department, 3:16-cv-00218. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20160413b80
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . On March 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 13), to which no timely objections have been filed. 1 For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the criminal case sought to be removed to this court from state court by the defendant is REMANDED to the state court for such proceedings as are appropriate in that court. This remand does not affect the pending civil case It is so ORDERED. Fo
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . On March 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 13), to which no timely objections have been filed. 1 For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the criminal case sought to be removed to this court from state court by the defendant is REMANDED to the state court for such proceedings as are appropriate in that court. This remand does not affect the pending civil case It is so ORDERED. Foo..
More
ORDER
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
On March 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 13), to which no timely objections have been filed.1 For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the criminal case sought to be removed to this court from state court by the defendant is REMANDED to the state court for such proceedings as are appropriate in that court. This remand does not affect the pending civil case
It is so ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. On March 18, 2016, the plaintiff filed an Amended Notice of Removal (Docket No. 26), which attempts to cure the defects in the removal of the criminal case outlined in the Report and Recommendation. The court does not interpret this document as objections to the R&R. Moreover, it does not cure the defects, and remand is appropriate.
Source: Leagle
