DAVIS v. JONES, 1:15cv193. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20170719f44
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RON CLARK , District Judge . Lavniel R. Davis, proceeding pro se , filed the above-styled lawsuit. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending this lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RON CLARK , District Judge . Lavniel R. Davis, proceeding pro se , filed the above-styled lawsuit. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending this lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RON CLARK, District Judge.
Lavniel R. Davis, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending this lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections were filed.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
The dismissal of this lawsuit is based on plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders directing him to file a list of exhibits and a list of witnesses. If plaintiff wishes to have this case reinstated on the court's active docket, he may do so by filing his lists by August 17, 2017.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
