IN RE ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, 05-17-00575-CV. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20170815b11
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by Justice MOLLY FRANCIS . In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court's order denying relator's motion to compel discovery. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124 , 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by Justice MOLLY FRANCIS . In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court's order denying relator's motion to compel discovery. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124 , 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion by Justice MOLLY FRANCIS.
In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court's order denying relator's motion to compel discovery. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
Source: Leagle
