Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Williams v. Lambright, 4:19-CV-342. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20200227e96 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On January 22, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #23) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Emergency Motions (Dkts. #6; #7; #8; #
More

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 22, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #23) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Emergency Motions (Dkts. #6; #7; #8; #9) be denied as moot, Plaintiff's "Motion for Adequate Assurance of Due Performance and for a More Definite Statement pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(E)" (Dkt. #10) be denied, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #21) be granted, and Plaintiff's suit be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Emergency Motions (Dkts. #6; #7; #8; #9) are DENIED AS MOOT.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Adequate Assurance of Due Performance and for a More Definite Statement pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(E)" (Dkt. #10) is DENIED.

It is finally ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #21) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief and under the federal and/or state debt collection acts are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; Plaintiff's claim to compel arbitration is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

All relief not previously granted is hereby denied.

The Clerk is directed to close this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer