BUXTON v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, 04-18-00614-CV. (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20190305460
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . One or more of the issues presented in Dennis Buxton and Son Chu Buxton v. United Services Automobile Association, No. 04-18-00614-CV, which is pending before this court, are similar to issues in Oscar Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds, which is currently pending before the Texas Supreme Court in cause number 17-1048. The supreme court held oral argument in Ortiz on February 20, 2019. Because the supreme court's resolution of Ortiz may impact the present appeal, this cour
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . One or more of the issues presented in Dennis Buxton and Son Chu Buxton v. United Services Automobile Association, No. 04-18-00614-CV, which is pending before this court, are similar to issues in Oscar Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds, which is currently pending before the Texas Supreme Court in cause number 17-1048. The supreme court held oral argument in Ortiz on February 20, 2019. Because the supreme court's resolution of Ortiz may impact the present appeal, this court..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
One or more of the issues presented in Dennis Buxton and Son Chu Buxton v. United Services Automobile Association, No. 04-18-00614-CV, which is pending before this court, are similar to issues in Oscar Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds, which is currently pending before the Texas Supreme Court in cause number 17-1048. The supreme court held oral argument in Ortiz on February 20, 2019. Because the supreme court's resolution of Ortiz may impact the present appeal, this court has determined that abating this appeal pending a decision by the supreme court will likely achieve the greatest judicial efficiency. Therefore, we ORDER the appeal in Dennis Buxton and Son Chu Buxton v. United Services Automobile Association, No. 04-18-00614-CV, ABATED. For administrative purposes, we ORDER the clerk of this court to treat this appeal as a closed case unless and until appellants file a motion requesting its reinstatement following the Texas Supreme Court's resolution of the issues in Ortiz.
We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
