Seehra v. Duke, C17-1711-RAJ. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180206g38
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . JOINT STIPULATION The parties hereby jointly STIPULATE AND AGREE that Petitioner's naturalization application be remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for adjudication and issuance of a decision within twenty-one (21) days after entry of this Order. The parties further stipulate and agree that the Court may make and enter an order dismissing this case without prejudice and withou
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . JOINT STIPULATION The parties hereby jointly STIPULATE AND AGREE that Petitioner's naturalization application be remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for adjudication and issuance of a decision within twenty-one (21) days after entry of this Order. The parties further stipulate and agree that the Court may make and enter an order dismissing this case without prejudice and without..
More
STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
JOINT STIPULATION
The parties hereby jointly STIPULATE AND AGREE that Petitioner's naturalization application be remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for adjudication and issuance of a decision within twenty-one (21) days after entry of this Order. The parties further stipulate and agree that the Court may make and enter an order dismissing this case without prejudice and without costs or fees to either party.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated, IT IS SO ORDERED. The case is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to either party.
FootNotes
1. On December 6, 2017, Kirstjen M. Nielsen was sworn in as the Secretary of Homeland Security. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Kirstjen M. Nielsen is substituted for Elaine C. Duke as a respondent in this case.
Source: Leagle
