Carrier v. Trico Products Corporation, 1:17-cv-00248. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190225520
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROLANDO OLVERA , District Judge . Before the Court is the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter the "R&R") (Docket No. 38), in the above-captioned case. The R&R recommended the Court grant Trico Products Corporation's (hereafter "Defendant") "Defendant's [First] Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 10) and deny "Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 33) as moot. See Docket No. 38 at
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROLANDO OLVERA , District Judge . Before the Court is the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter the "R&R") (Docket No. 38), in the above-captioned case. The R&R recommended the Court grant Trico Products Corporation's (hereafter "Defendant") "Defendant's [First] Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 10) and deny "Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 33) as moot. See Docket No. 38 at 1..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROLANDO OLVERA, District Judge.
Before the Court is the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter the "R&R") (Docket No. 38), in the above-captioned case. The R&R recommended the Court grant Trico Products Corporation's (hereafter "Defendant") "Defendant's [First] Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 10) and deny "Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 33) as moot. See Docket No. 38 at 16. In the alternative, the R&R recommended the Court grant Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 33) and deny Defendant's First Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 10) as moot. See id. Plaintiff timely filed "Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter "Plaintiff's Objections") (Docket No. 39). In turn, Defendant filed a response (Docket No. 40) to Plaintiff's Objections.
After a de novo review of the record, the R&R is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's First Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED. Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's Objections are OVERRULED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case.
Source: Leagle
