Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. TRUJILLO-ROJAS, 1:14-CR-45. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20140917g45 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge. Defendant Hilda Trujillo Rojas ("Defendant") filed a motion to suppress evidence discovered after an allegedly unlawful arrest and allegedly unlawful search of an automobile (Court File No. 43). The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter, who held a hearing on September 28, 2014 and subsequently filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concluding that Defendant's motion should be denied (Court File No. 73). De
More

ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge.

Defendant Hilda Trujillo Rojas ("Defendant") filed a motion to suppress evidence discovered after an allegedly unlawful arrest and allegedly unlawful search of an automobile (Court File No. 43). The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter, who held a hearing on September 28, 2014 and subsequently filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concluding that Defendant's motion should be denied (Court File No. 73). Defendant subsequently filed an objection to the Supplemental R&R (Court File No. 74), to which the government filed a response (Court File No. 78).

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R&R (Court File No. 73). Accordingly, Defendant's motion to suppress is DENIED (Court File No. 43).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer