Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pringler v. U.S., 5:11-CR-0040-C. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20190501g70 Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER SAM R. CUMMINGS , District Judge . Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising that the Court should deny Movant's claim that counsel provided ineffective assistance with respect to the Government's plea offer and that Movant's Motion under Section 2255 should be dismissed. Movant has failed to file any objections and the time to do so has now expired. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and
More

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising that the Court should deny Movant's claim that counsel provided ineffective assistance with respect to the Government's plea offer and that Movant's Motion under Section 2255 should be dismissed. Movant has failed to file any objections and the time to do so has now expired.

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, Movant's claim for ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to the Government' s plea offer is hereby DENIED and Movant's Motion under Section 2255 is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer