U.S. v. STEWART, 1:06CR00046. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20120606c94
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in the Opinion accompanying this Final Order, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF Nos. 163 & 164) is DENIED, and the motion is CONSTRUED as a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 2255; 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to redocket the motion (ECF No. 163 & 164) as a 2255 motion; 3. The 2255 motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice as successive and str
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in the Opinion accompanying this Final Order, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF Nos. 163 & 164) is DENIED, and the motion is CONSTRUED as a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 2255; 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to redocket the motion (ECF No. 163 & 164) as a 2255 motion; 3. The 2255 motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice as successive and stri..
More
ORDER
JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the Opinion accompanying this Final Order, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF Nos. 163 & 164) is DENIED, and the motion is CONSTRUED as a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255;
2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to redocket the motion (ECF No. 163 & 164) as a § 2255 motion;
3. The § 2255 motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice as successive and stricken from the active docket; and
4. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED, based upon the court's finding that the defendant has not made the requisite showing of denial of a substantial right.
Source: Leagle
