Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ortiz v. Berryhill, 4:16-CV-209-A. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20171128d41 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER JOHN McBRYDE , District Judge . Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Alma Ortiz, is plaintiff and the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, currently Nancy A. Berryhill, ("Commissioner") is defendant. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for disability and disability insurance benefits. On November 8, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his
More

ORDER

Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Alma Ortiz, is plaintiff and the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, currently Nancy A. Berryhill, ("Commissioner") is defendant. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for disability and disability insurance benefits. On November 8, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his recommendation ("FC&R"), and granted the parties until November 22, 2017, in which to file and serve any written objections thereto. To date, neither party has filed objections. Nevertheless, the court has conducted a thorough study of the record, the magistrate judge's proposed findings and conclusions, and applicable legal authorities, and has concluded that the recommendation of the magistrate judge should be accepted.

Therefore,

The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on September 14, 2012, plaintiff, Alma Ortiz, is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act, be, and is hereby, affirmed.

FootNotes


1. Nancy A. Berryhill replaced Carolyn W. Colvin as acting commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Berryhill is automatically substituted as the party of record.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer