Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID, 9:19-CV-148. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20190829c49 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER KEITH F. GIBLIN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Richard Torres Ramirez, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United S
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

Petitioner Richard Torres Ramirez, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) allows a district court to "entertain an application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A state prisoner is required to file his federal petition for writ of habeas corpus in either the district where the prisoner is incarcerated or the district where the prisoner was convicted and sentenced. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Although both district courts have jurisdiction to entertain the application, "[t]he district court for the district wherein such an application is filed in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice may transfer the application to the other district court for hearing and determination." Id.

Petitioner filed this petition in the Lufkin Division of the Eastern District of Texas. However, petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Smith County which is located in the Tyler Division.

The court has considered the circumstances and has determined that the interests of justice would be served if this petition were transferred to the division where petitioner was convicted and sentenced. Therefore, the petition should be transferred to the Tyler Division for hearing and determination. It is accordingly

ORDERED that this petition is TRANSFERRED to the Tyler Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer