Filed: Dec. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-23-2005 Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-1876 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 8. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/8 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-23-2005 Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-1876 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 8. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/8 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the O..
More
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-23-2005 Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-1876 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Wilderman v. Cooper & Scully PC" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 8. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/8 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-1876 BRUCE J. WILDERMAN, D.D.S.; HEIDY D. WILDERMAN, Appellants v. COOPER & SCULLY, P.C. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 04-cv-00460) District Judge: Honorable Stewart Dalzell Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) September 30, 2005 Before: ALITO, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges RESTANI,* Chief Judge (Opinion filed October 28, 2005) ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION * Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. AMBRO, Circuit Judge IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed October 28, 2005, be amended as follows: On page 3, note 1, line 12, replace the word “the” with “. . .”. On page 6, first full paragraph beginning “On the other hand”, line 4, replace the word “finding” with the word “holding”. On page 6, first full paragraph beginning “On the other hand”, line 9, replace the word “finding” with the word “holding”. On page 7, last paragraph, second line, after the word “appealable” and before the quote starting “‘based upon ...’”, insert the phrase “because it was”. By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: December 23, 2005 CMH/cc: RMG, REM, SJP, GWB, KK, GW 2