BABLES v. CitiMORTGAGE, 4:14cv169. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150626874
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. SCHELL , Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 2, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that, pursuant to Federal Rule o
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. SCHELL , Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 2, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that, pursuant to Federal Rule of..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RICHARD A. SCHELL, Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 2, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), this case should be dismissed without prejudice.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), this case is dismissed without prejudice and this matter is closed on the court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
