Gonzales v. Davis, 7:18-cv-010-O-BP. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190529i04
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his convictions on one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child and three counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied.
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his convictions on one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child and three counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied. S..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REED O'CONNOR, District Judge.
This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which Petitioner challenges his convictions on one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child and three counts of indecency with a child by sexual contact. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied. See ECF No. 25. Objections were filed by Petitioner. ECF No. 29. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made, and reviewed the remaining Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
