U.S. v. SILLS, 11-6048. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110321132
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Edward Sills appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion in which he sought a reduction to his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sills , No. 2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Edward Sills appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion in which he sought a reduction to his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sills , No. 2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Edward Sills appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion in which he sought a reduction to his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sills, No. 2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
