Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WALKER v. OWENS, 7:13cv00425. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia Number: infdco20150416825 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER NORMAN K. MOON , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED that Walker's motion to amend (Docket No. 55) is GRANTED , defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED in part as to defendants Owens, Gibson, Miller, Franklin, L. Mullins, R. Mullins, Messer, Pease, Stanley, Bunch, Swiney, Walrath, Mathena, Huff, Moceri, Hinkle, and Clarke, and DENIED in part as to defendants Sykes, Still, and Tate; defendants Sykes,
More

ORDER

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED that Walker's motion to amend (Docket No. 55) is GRANTED, defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED in part as to defendants Owens, Gibson, Miller, Franklin, L. Mullins, R. Mullins, Messer, Pease, Stanley, Bunch, Swiney, Walrath, Mathena, Huff, Moceri, Hinkle, and Clarke, and DENIED in part as to defendants Sykes, Still, and Tate; defendants Sykes, Still, and Tate are DIRECTED to FILE, within thirty days from the entry of this order, an Answer and, pursuant to Standing Order No. 2013-6, a motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavit(s). Walker's motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 50) of the order denying his motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. Walker's motion concerning discovery (Docket No. 49) is GRANTED to the extent that Walker shall submit all discovery requests related to the remaining claims and defendants within twenty days of the entry of this order and defendants Sykes, Still, and Tate are DIRECTED to respond to those requests within sixty days of the entry of this order. This order shall supersede all prior orders concerning discovery. The Clerk shall TERMINATE Owens, Gibson, Miller, Franklin, L. Mullins, R. Mullins, Messer, Pease, Stanley, Bunch, Swiney, Walrath, Mathena, Huff, Moceri, Hinkle, and Clarke as defendants to this action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer