Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Leahy, 03-4490 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 03-4490 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-28-2006 USA v. Leahy Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 03-4490 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "USA v. Leahy" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1335. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1335 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Cou
More
Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-28-2006 USA v. Leahy Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 03-4490 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "USA v. Leahy" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1335. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1335 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 03-4490/4542/4560 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL J. LEAHY Appellant in No. 03-4490 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY SMITH Appellant in No. 03-4542 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANTONE, INC. Appellant in No. 03-4560 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal No. 01-cr-00260-2) District Judge: Honorable J. Curtis Joyner Argued June 8, 2005 Before: FUENTES, VAN ANTWERPEN, and BECKER, Circuit Judges. ORDER AMENDING OPINION The concurring and dissenting opinion filed on March 22, 2006, in the above referenced case is amended as follows: The word “disjunctive” in the fourth line of the continued footnote on page 75 should read “conjunctive”. By the Court: /s/ Edward R. Becker Circuit Judge Dated: March 28, 2006
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer