Filed: Jun. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6376 HARRY THOMAS NETHKEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOB BELL, Monongalia County Commission President; ANSEL KENNEDY, Monongalia County Commissioner; JOHN PYLES, Monongalia County Commissioner, JOE BARTOLO, Monongalia County Sheriff; AL KISNER, Chief Deputy; TODD FORBES, Deputy, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. K
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6376 HARRY THOMAS NETHKEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOB BELL, Monongalia County Commission President; ANSEL KENNEDY, Monongalia County Commissioner; JOHN PYLES, Monongalia County Commissioner, JOE BARTOLO, Monongalia County Sheriff; AL KISNER, Chief Deputy; TODD FORBES, Deputy, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Ke..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6376
HARRY THOMAS NETHKEN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOB BELL, Monongalia County Commission
President; ANSEL KENNEDY, Monongalia County
Commissioner; JOHN PYLES, Monongalia County
Commissioner, JOE BARTOLO, Monongalia County
Sheriff; AL KISNER, Chief Deputy; TODD FORBES,
Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-125)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry Thomas Nethken, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Harry Thomas Nethken, Jr., appeals the recommendation of the
magistrate judge dismissing certain parties and claims in this
§ 1983 action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2