Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Choice Hotels Intl v. Talati, 03-1313 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1313 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 16, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1313 CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus R. TALATI, Inc., A Ohio Corporation; PRAVIN TALATI, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-02-1486-DKC) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 16, 2004 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1313 CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus R. TALATI, Inc., A Ohio Corporation; PRAVIN TALATI, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-02-1486-DKC) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 16, 2004 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. James G. Healy, CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: R. Talati, Inc., a Ohio Corporation, and Pravin Talati appeal the district court’s order confirming an arbitration award in favor of Choice Hotels International, Incorporated. We have reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Choice Hotels Int’l v. Talati, No. CA-02-1486-DKC (D. Md. filed Feb. 14, 2003 & entered Feb. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because we have granted Appellants’ uncontested motion to submit the case on the briefs and because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer