Filed: Nov. 22, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2041 BETTYANN L. TALLEY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NANCY D. JONAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-612-9-8) Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: November 22, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2041 BETTYANN L. TALLEY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NANCY D. JONAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-612-9-8) Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: November 22, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy D...
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2041 BETTYANN L. TALLEY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NANCY D. JONAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-612-9-8) Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: November 22, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy D. Jonas, Appellant Pro Se. Bettyann L. Talley, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Nancy D. Jonas appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Talley v. Jonas, No. CA-00-612-9-8 (D.S.C. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
