Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Little v. Commissioner, IRS, 06-1934 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1934 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1934 JIMMY JACKSON LITTLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (05-9013-L) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Jackson Little, Appellant Pro Se. Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1934 JIMMY JACKSON LITTLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (05-9013-L) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Jackson Little, Appellant Pro Se. Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jimmy Jackson Little appeals the tax court’s orders sustaining the Commissioner’s collection determination with respect to his 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 federal income tax liability and imposing a penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the tax court. Little v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 05-9013-L (U.S.T.C. Feb. 15, 2006). We deny the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions without prejudice.* We deny Little’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * The Commissioner is free to seek sanctions if Little files another appeal in this court raising similar arguments. - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer