Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cosby v. Legal Services Corp, 06-1787 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1787 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 11, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1787 TERESA N. COSBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and JOHN EIDLEMAN, in his capacity as Vice President of the Legal Services Corporation and in his individual capacity; DANILLO CARDONA; DAVID DE LA TOUR, in their capacities as employees of the Legal Services Corporation and in their individual capacities, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1787 TERESA N. COSBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and JOHN EIDLEMAN, in his capacity as Vice President of the Legal Services Corporation and in his individual capacity; DANILLO CARDONA; DAVID DE LA TOUR, in their capacities as employees of the Legal Services Corporation and in their individual capacities, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:05-cv-00131-GRA) Submitted: April 30, 2007 Decided: May 11, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie F. Bradley, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF WILLIE F. BRADLEY, JR. LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; J. Todd Rutherford, THE RUTHERFORD LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William S. Brown, Elizabeth M. McMillan, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Teresa N. Cosby appeals the district court’s order granting the Legal Services Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cosby v. Legal Servs. Corp., No. 6:05-cv-00131-GRA (D.S.C. May 12, 2006 & June 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer