Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Incorporated, 08-1780 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1780 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1780 QUINTIN T. VASCIANNIE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TIDEWATER SKANSKA, INCORPORATED; SKANSKA USA CIVIL SOUTHEAST, INCORPORATED; SKANSKA USA CIVIL, INCORPORATED, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01027-LMB-TCB) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1780 QUINTIN T. VASCIANNIE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TIDEWATER SKANSKA, INCORPORATED; SKANSKA USA CIVIL SOUTHEAST, INCORPORATED; SKANSKA USA CIVIL, INCORPORATED, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01027-LMB-TCB) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zachary A. Kitts, COOK & KITTS, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. A. W. VanderMeer, Jr., Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Quintin T. Vasciannie appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) claim and his 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Inc., No. 1:07-01027- LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed June 6, 2008; entered June 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer