Filed: Apr. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2384 WILLA GLOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOOD LION, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-04064-CWH-RSC) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willa Glover, Appellant P
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2384 WILLA GLOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOOD LION, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-04064-CWH-RSC) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willa Glover, Appellant Pr..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2384
WILLA GLOVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FOOD LION, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (2:07-cv-04064-CWH-RSC)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willa Glover, Appellant Pro Se. Erika Harrison, TURNER, PADGET,
GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, Carmelo Barone
Sammataro, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willa Glover seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting partial summary judgment to Food Lion, LLC. * This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Glover seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
deny Glover’s motion for transcripts and dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
Glover incorrectly identified the defendant as Food Lion,
Inc.
2