Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Martin, 09-6282 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-6282 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 17, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT H. MARTIN, a/k/a Biggie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00452-1) Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: July 17, 2009 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT H. MARTIN, a/k/a Biggie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00452-1) Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: July 17, 2009 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrea L. Moseley, ZWERLING, LEIBIG & MOSELEY, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Robert E. Draba, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Gordon D. Kromberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert H. Martin appeals the district court’s order partially granting Martin’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martin, No. 1:98-cr- 00452-1 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 6, 2009; entered Feb. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer