Filed: Mar. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2334 DEREK N. JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02638-RWT) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010 Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek N. Jarvis, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2334 DEREK N. JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02638-RWT) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010 Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek N. Jarvis, Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2334 DEREK N. JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02638-RWT) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010 Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. GEICO Ins. Comp., No. 8:09-cv-02638-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
