In re: Lusk, 10-1228 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 10-1228
Visitors: 23
Filed: May 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1228 In Re: BARRY G. LUSK, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (8:08-cr-01218-HFF-1) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry G. Lusk, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Barry Lusk has made an original pro se motion for a writ of habeas cor
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1228 In Re: BARRY G. LUSK, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (8:08-cr-01218-HFF-1) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry G. Lusk, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Barry Lusk has made an original pro se motion for a writ of habeas corp..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1228
In Re: BARRY G. LUSK,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
(8:08-cr-01218-HFF-1)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry G. Lusk, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barry Lusk has made an original pro se motion for a
writ of habeas corpus. Although we are authorized under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) to exercise jurisdiction over original
petitions for habeas corpus relief, we are not required to do so
and we typically decline to exercise such jurisdiction and
instead transfer the matter to the appropriate district court.
See Fed. R. App. P. 22(a). We will not transfer a habeas corpus
motion unless the transfer would serve the interests of justice.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006). We conclude that a transfer in
this matter would not be in the interests of justice.
Accordingly we deny the motion for an original writ of
habeas corpus, and dismiss the proceeding.
DISMISSED
2
Source: CourtListener