Filed: Aug. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6603 KAIMEL L. GLENN, Plaintiff - Appellant, and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Party-in-Interest, v. CMS; ISAAS TESSEMA, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01700-WDQ) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6603 KAIMEL L. GLENN, Plaintiff - Appellant, and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Party-in-Interest, v. CMS; ISAAS TESSEMA, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01700-WDQ) Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirm..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6603
KAIMEL L. GLENN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest,
v.
CMS; ISAAS TESSEMA, Dr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01700-WDQ)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kaimel L. Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Mary
Beth Ewen, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kaimel L. Glenn appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Glenn v. CMS, No. 1:09-cv-01700-WDQ (D. Md. Apr. 8,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2