Filed: May 25, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7494 JOSE HERNANDEZ, Petitioner – Appellant, v. JOHN R. OWEN, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:10-cv-02069-CMC) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 25, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7494 JOSE HERNANDEZ, Petitioner – Appellant, v. JOHN R. OWEN, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:10-cv-02069-CMC) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 25, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished o..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7494
JOSE HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
JOHN R. OWEN,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (4:10-cv-02069-CMC)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 25, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jose Hernandez, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hernandez v. Owen, No.
4:10-cv-02069-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2