Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tony Chambers v. NC Dep't of Juvenile Justice, 13-2299 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2299 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2299 TONY E. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF N.C. DEPT. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE & DELINQUENCY PREVENTION, Defendant – Appellee, and BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor; MACK SIMMONS; DONALD BURNS; SANDRA VAMPER; KAY EVANS; ROGER REYNOLDS; LINDA WHEELER HAYES; DAVID E. JONES, Deputy Secretary, NC Department of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2299 TONY E. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF N.C. DEPT. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE & DELINQUENCY PREVENTION, Defendant – Appellee, and BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor; MACK SIMMONS; DONALD BURNS; SANDRA VAMPER; KAY EVANS; ROGER REYNOLDS; LINDA WHEELER HAYES; DAVID E. JONES, Deputy Secretary, NC Department of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00315-CCE-LPA) Submitted: March 17, 2014 Decided: April 2, 2014 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony E. Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald Kevin Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Tony E. Chambers appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Chambers’ employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chambers v. N.C. Dep’t of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, No. 1:10-cv-00315- CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer