Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1279 JUNIOR CLYDE SHERWIN WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted: July 22, 2014 Decided: July 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Junior Clyde Sherwin Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Robbin Kinmonth Blaya, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JU
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1279 JUNIOR CLYDE SHERWIN WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted: July 22, 2014 Decided: July 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Junior Clyde Sherwin Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Robbin Kinmonth Blaya, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUS..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1279
JUNIOR CLYDE SHERWIN WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals
Submitted: July 22, 2014 Decided: July 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Junior Clyde Sherwin Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Robbin
Kinmonth Blaya, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Junior Clyde Williams, a native and citizen of Guyana,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed
the administrative record and Williams’ claims and find no abuse
of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2014). We accordingly
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Williams (B.I.A. Mar. 20, 2014). We grant
Williams’ application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2