Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6091 WILLIE T. BOBBITT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KEITH WHITENER, Superintendent; STEPHANIE HALL, Assistant Unit Manager; COCKERHAM, Sgt. of Green Unit; DANIEL BROWN, Sgt., Facility Intelligence Officer; LINK, Correctional Officer; BEARD, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judg
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6091 WILLIE T. BOBBITT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KEITH WHITENER, Superintendent; STEPHANIE HALL, Assistant Unit Manager; COCKERHAM, Sgt. of Green Unit; DANIEL BROWN, Sgt., Facility Intelligence Officer; LINK, Correctional Officer; BEARD, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6091
WILLIE T. BOBBITT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KEITH WHITENER, Superintendent; STEPHANIE HALL, Assistant
Unit Manager; COCKERHAM, Sgt. of Green Unit; DANIEL BROWN,
Sgt., Facility Intelligence Officer; LINK, Correctional
Officer; BEARD, Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00011-FDW)
Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: June 2, 2015
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie T. Bobbitt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie T. Bobbitt appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without
prejudice and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Bobbitt v. Whitener,
No. 5:14-cv-00011-FDW (W.D.N.C. July 28, 2014; Jan. 9, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2