Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tully Tavares v. United Airlines, Dulles Airport, 15-2129 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-2129 Visitors: 85
Filed: Mar. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2129 TULLY TAVARES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED AIRLINES, DULLES AIRPORT; MARCELO MERLAN, United Airlines Ramp Supervisor; CHRIS BRANCH, United Airlines Ramp Supervisor; IAM, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01121-LO-JFA) Submitted
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2129 TULLY TAVARES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED AIRLINES, DULLES AIRPORT; MARCELO MERLAN, United Airlines Ramp Supervisor; CHRIS BRANCH, United Airlines Ramp Supervisor; IAM, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01121-LO-JFA) Submitted: February 29, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tully Tavares, Appellant Pro Se. Malik Kemal Cutlar, Hugh Scott Johnson, Jr., PCT LAW GROUP, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tully Tavares appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss Tavares’ civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tavares v. United Airlines, No. 1:14-cv-01121-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer