Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6446 JAZZMAN LEVERT DANIEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BEN FRAZER, Richmond Police Department; JOSEPH RONAN, Richmond Police Department; JACOB DEBOARD, Richmond Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00701-RAJ-RJK) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018 Before WYNN and D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6446 JAZZMAN LEVERT DANIEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BEN FRAZER, Richmond Police Department; JOSEPH RONAN, Richmond Police Department; JACOB DEBOARD, Richmond Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00701-RAJ-RJK) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018 Before WYNN and DI..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6446
JAZZMAN LEVERT DANIEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BEN FRAZER, Richmond Police Department; JOSEPH RONAN, Richmond
Police Department; JACOB DEBOARD, Richmond Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00701-RAJ-RJK)
Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jazzman Levert Daniel, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Earl Hill, Jr., CITY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jazzman Levert Daniel appeals the district court’s orders deferring discovery and
denying relief on Daniel’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Daniel v. Frazer, No. 2:16-cv-00701-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. June 12, 2017;
Mar. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2