Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2241 ANDRE JAVION PORTEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS; THOMAS J. VILSACK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-13928) Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 25, 2019 Before KING and RICHARD
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2241 ANDRE JAVION PORTEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS; THOMAS J. VILSACK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-13928) Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 25, 2019 Before KING and RICHARDS..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2241
ANDRE JAVION PORTEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; OFFICE OF THE
ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS; THOMAS J. VILSACK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-13928)
Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 25, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Javion Portee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andre Javion Portee appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge granting the United States Department of
Agriculture’s motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for summary
judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Portee v. USDA, No. 2:15-cv-13928
(S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2018). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Portee asserts numerous issues in his informal brief. However, in his objections
to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, he objected only to the magistrate
judge’s findings related to a February 7, 2013, letter to his Congressman. He has
therefore waived appellate review of all other issues. United States v. Midgette, 478,
F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007).
2