Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Supreme Court of Virginia Robert H. Anderson, Iii, Assistant Attorney General, 89-6804 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6804 Visitors: 31
Filed: Feb. 13, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 1366 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; Robert H. Anderson, III, Assistant Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-6804. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Cir
More

896 F.2d 1366
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; Robert H. Anderson, III,
Assistant Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6804.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 13, 1990.

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S.1153 (1982), and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer