Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kenneth Morrison v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 89-7790 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7790 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 17, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 902 F.2d 29 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kenneth MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary T. DIXON; Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-7790. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circui
More

902 F.2d 29
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the
State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7790.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1990.
Decided April 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Eugene A. Gordon, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 88-1087-D)

Kenneth Morrison, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Kenneth Morrison seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Morrison v. Dixon, C/A No. 88-1087-D (M.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer