Filed: Jun. 15, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 907 F.2d 1137 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Clayton CAUDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENTAL HEALTH BOARD; Judge Johnson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-6822. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1990. Decided June 1
Summary: 907 F.2d 1137 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Clayton CAUDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENTAL HEALTH BOARD; Judge Johnson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-6822. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1990. Decided June 15..
More
907 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Clayton CAUDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MENTAL HEALTH BOARD; Judge Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6822.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 1990.
Decided June 15, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-299-N)
Robert Clayton Caudell, appellant pro se.
Steven Lieberman, City Attorney's Office, Portsmouth, Va., Caroline Lockerby, William H. Hauser, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Robert Clayton Caudell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Caudell v. Mental Health Board, CA-89-299-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
